Irrecoverable Debts and VAT

In the case of VAT 1247:  XYZ Company (Pty) Ltd v The Commissioner for The South African Revenue Service, the court was faced with interpreting section 22(3) of the VAT Act, notably, in relation to a period before 22(3A) was introduced. Section 22(3) of the VAT Act in essence requires a person who has claimed an input tax deduction to make an output VAT adjustment if the invoice on which the input was claimed has not been settled within a period of 12 months.

The facts of the case are briefly that a supply was made from company A to Company B. Company B proceeded to claim an input tax credit back from SARS and once refunded, paid the Vat portion for the supply to Company A. Company A subsequently paid the VAT on the supply across to SARS and credited the loan account in respect of the invoice and debited a long term liability.  The long term liability was not settled by Company B within 12 months.

The taxpayer argued that crediting the loan account of Company A constituted payment of the invoice and accordingly, section 22(3) should not find application and in addition, there was no prejudice to SARS. SARS, in turn, argued that the debt still existed and was not settled within 12 months and that section 22(3) should apply. Read more

Charging VAT on Supplies Made by Another?

The recent case of D v Commissioner for South African Revenue Service (VAT 1390), which is an appeal referred by the taxpayer to the Western Cape Tax Court after being dissatisfied with the decision by the Tax Board, reconfirms that supplies made by an independent contractor to the taxpayer and recovered from customers by the taxpayer is subject to VAT in the hands of the taxpayer.

The facts of the case are briefly that a taxpayer had engaged the services of certain drivers to collect and deliver goods to customers . The taxpayer would invoice the customer a VAT inclusive charge and would plainly list the amount payable to the driver on the invoice excluding VAT.  The customers would settle the full invoice amount and the taxpayer would in turn pay over the disbursement charge to the relevant driver.

The Tax Court held that the taxpayer is liable for the VAT on the disbursement as representing consideration received by the taxpayer for rendering services by the taxpayer to its customer. The fact that the drivers were independent contractors and the fact that the amounts were required to be paid over to the drivers were held by the court to be irrelevant.

Taxpayers who are required to pay amounts invoiced by them over to third parties should take care to ensure VAT is correctly accounted for and it is recommended that professional advice be sought in this regard. Failure to correctly account for VAT gives rise to penalties, interest and possible criminal prosecution.

South African VAT, Foreign Companies & Employees

Foreign companies often need to send employees to South Africa for execution of local contracts or to assist South African group companies for various reasons. While South African income tax considerations, permanent establishment concerns and double tax treaty provisions are often considered in detail, the South African VAT (or ‘goods and services tax’ as it is known in many other jurisdictions) consequences are hardly ever taken into account.

South Africa, unlike many other countries in the world, does not have specific place of supply rules. Rather, South African VAT is collected through the vendor registration method or the reverse charge mechanism for imported goods or services. In this article we will focus on the vendor registration method and the possible registration obligation for foreign companies consequent upon employees operating in South Africa.

The vendor registration method:

The vendor registration method requires of any person (whether local or foreign, resident or not resident) to register for VAT in South Africa if that person carries on an enterprise for South African VAT purposes with past or expected sales exceeding ZAR 1 000 000. Such registration gives rise to regular reporting obligations to the South African Revenue Service (SARS) and failure to report where an obligation to do so exists gives rise to penalties and criminal sanctions.

An enterprise will be carried on for South African VAT purposes if a person conducts any activity in South Africa on a regular or continuous basis and in the course of furtherance of that local activity sells either goods or services. What exactly constitute a continuous or regular activity in South Africa for South African VAT purposes is not entirely clear under South African law and each case needs to be considered on its own facts. SARS have, however, expressed a formal view that short bi-monthly visits to South Africa by more than one employee of a foreign company is sufficient to trigger an obligation on a specific foreign company under consideration to register for South African VAT and report to SARS. Similarly, SARS have expressed a view that short training sessions provided in South Africa on software products of a specific foreign company under consideration by employees of that foreign company is likely to trigger a registration obligation under the vendor registration method and concomitant reporting obligations.

Foreign companies sending employees to South Africa should take care to consider South African VAT implications and are advised to seek advice in respect of same. South African VAT implications are not driven by the existence or otherwise of a permanent establishment in South Africa or any South African income tax obligation. In fact, it often occurs that a foreign company has no South African income tax obligation but indeed has a South African VAT obligation.

2016 National Budget

Click on the link below to go to the National Treasury Page and view all the available documents you can download in regards to the 2016 National Budget.

Contact Us if you require any assistance.

Click here to view the 2016 National Budget Page.